May 21, 2004

Attention graphophiles

luckycurve.gif

In honour of our graduates today

I saw this some time ago but lost the link, so was delighted to see it again: Danny Gregory reviews, and draws, a bunch of pens for drawing. I wish he would do the same with pens for writing. (His site, Everyday Matters, is a feast.) (From le blaugue à beleg, via Boing Boing).

Posts at moleskinerie on pen addiction and how we love notebooks.

The Vintage Pens Website.

On Pens at anti-mega. Thought to ponder: "I don't trust designers who do not have either a notebook or a pen fetish."

Just what the doctor ordered: Phil Agre's Commentaries on Cheap Pens.

History of Pens & Writing Instruments (including the helpful "How do they get lead in a wooden pencil?")

How Ballpoint Pens Work.

Cutting Quill Pens from Feathers.

Michael Harrington's beaded ballpoint pens.

"The personalized journal cries out for pen to match": "sprucing up a batch of bland Bics."

Bill's Pens: "a site dedicated to the joy of pen collecting."

Links to vintage advertisements with great slogans like, "Parker Ink makes millions think"

Pentrace: all things pen.

Pens for lie detectors or medical instruments?

Consumer alert: Gel Pens Recalled by Colorbök because "the end caps can shoot off with great force, posing a risk of eye and facial injuries."

Needles & Pens zine and clothing shop.

Pens & Needles: political cartoons.

The Seinfeld space pen episode.

Fisher Original NASA Astronaut Pens.

And finally, in the interest of full disclosure, a haiku I published in 1988 when I was still practically a child. Well, not practically. But theoretically.1

Sensuous pen strokes;
nib sinks into soft paper —
my name in your flesh.

1 Catalyst: 3rd erotica collection. 17 (1988): 22.

Update (12:54): I have been agonizing over that haiku since I posted it; I really hate the word "sensuous" there. If I were to rewrite it I would use a short phrase, like "Several curled" or "Line of curved."

Update (10:10): "Set of curved."

Scribbled at May 21, 2004 12:05 AM AST | Hmmm? (9) | TrackBack (3) | Link Cosmos | More? writing
Hmmm?

Great post. What a lot of work!

I bought a couple of those moleskine journals on a rec from someone I know and while I usually don't go in for the hype, these things are pretty nice. One failing I find is I often want my own handwriting/text to look good enough to match the journal. I'm loathe to scribble (I hate to tell you) and sketch and strikeout. That's not conducive to good work, I think.

There's a little stationary place in the East Village in NYC that sells nice little journals (ruled, cloth binding, no elastic or nerfty pouch) for about a third the price of the Moleskine. The covers aren't as nice and the paper is standard, but I feel I can scratch them to shit without a second thought. Useful when you're writing-to-get-to-whatever-it-is-you're-writing-that-isn't-what-you-thought-you-were-writing-about. You know?

I want my journal to be a place where I empty my head like an upturned bag, not where I disassemble it in an orderly fashion (presumably to reassemble it later -- it ain't goin back together...).

Scribbled by George at May 21, 2004 12:41 AM | Permalink

What an image: emptying your head like a bag!

I have a moleskine journal but when I see the pics of their journals other people post, I feel I have to tuck it away out of sight. No cool doodles; no arcane diagrams; just lists of things, or some point-form jottings, for the most part.

I wonder if some people keep private journals, for grocery lists and whatnot, secret and separate from their public, photoblogged journals?

Scribbled by mj at May 21, 2004 12:52 AM | Permalink

Many, many thanks for the links.
As for me, I finally found a use for all the nice notebooks I buy: scribbling notes for weblog entries...
so, basically, this is like many other technology switches - weblogs are not simply outdating paper journals; instead they may change their use. Today, I would probably post my feelings about a book after - or instead of - scribbling them on paper, but there will always be thing I write that I don't want to show.

Scribbled by rose at May 21, 2004 07:26 AM | Permalink

MJ, that's exactly it. My journal work isn't photogenic -- backslanted writing, scribbles over stupid turns of phrase, Leonardo-esque sketch-free.

Rose, I find the web/computer has just help me define what is my artistic "work" from what is my daily grind. Lists go on the computer (for those lovely reminder messages that help me get things done), notes go in the book. The problem with writing myself reminders in books is that I seldom look back a few pages to be reminded....

Re: an emptied bag -- poet. Sorry.

Scribbled by George at May 21, 2004 10:10 AM | Permalink

Don't apologize.

(There are worse things to empty than a bag.)

Scribbled by mj at May 21, 2004 10:16 AM | Permalink

Wow, so many links to visit on pens...thank you! I visit Danny Gregory regularly and saw his pens entry. I love his and many others' journals full of neat sketches and lovely text, and feel ashamed of my sketchbook! It's mostly full of notes about my processes, ideas, and sometimes copied artists statements by other artists that I identify with, to help me write my own! The sketchbook is NOT a work of art. However, a great pen is a joy and makes such a difference to my handwriting and the few little thumbnail sketches I do. As for blogging ideas/notes, they are on scrap paper and on the computer....hmmm, maybe I should get a lovely journal for this?? Isn't it interesting how similar writers and some visual artists are when it comes to journals?

Scribbled by Marja-Leena at May 21, 2004 03:17 PM | Permalink

Even non-artist journals can be visually very interesting--sometimes they become scrapbooks featuring quotations, different handwriting as you use different pens, paper cuttings or ticket stubs... I think that the habit of showing "ordinary things" on websites -- down to grocery lists -- may help even us bookish people to look differently at the tools of our work (not that we must show them, of course!)
I used to save lovely notebooks for "later" (goodlooking things? important things? learning to draw?) Now I simply use them.
I have a good story about a found sketchbook, I hope to find the time to post it soon.

Scribbled by rose at May 23, 2004 09:22 AM | Permalink

I know exactly what you mean! I, too, have often bought a attractive journal and saved it for "later."

When you post your story, feel free to link here. I will get mio marito to translate.

Scribbled by mj at May 23, 2004 10:51 AM | Permalink

uhm, I tried pinging this entry but it seems id didn't work. the story I mentioned is now here:
http://todrownarose.blogs.com/blog/2004/06/a_found_sketchb.html

Scribbled by rose at June 11, 2004 10:30 AM | Permalink

Trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://webteam.unb.ca/cgi-bin/MT-2.21/mt-tb.cgi/572


Here's what others have to say about Attention graphophiles:

» Catching up on a ton of blog reading from Household Opera
Scribblingwoman shares my pen fetish. (I'm more of a fountain pen person, though. Someday I will earn enough money to splurge on a red marbled Aurora Optima. Or a Delta Dolce Vita Mini. Or a high-end Pelikan. Drool.) Drooling of...[read more]
Tracked: May 24, 2004 01:48 PM

» a found sketchbook from to drown a rose
found among the things of someone who can’t tell me about it (the reason for this is mentioned here). i guess she must have found it in turn; i don’t know when – no later than 2001, not sooner than...[read more]
Tracked: June 7, 2004 04:50 AM

» a found sketchbook from to drown a rose
found among the things of someone who can’t tell me about it (the reason for this is mentioned here). i guess she must have found it in turn; i don’t know when – no later than 2001, not sooner than...[read more]
Tracked: June 11, 2004 10:25 AM

Post a comment