A couple of years back, on the recommendation of a colleague from History, I read a Patricia Cornwall novel, I can't remember which one. She (my colleague) said that she loved Cornwall's stuff, particularly the way in which she depicted Kay Scarpetta, her main character, as a professional woman. So I went on a bit of a reading jag and have read, I think, just about all of the Scarpetta novels. And yes, I could appreciate what my friend saw in her, but with each novel I felt a growing unease, and not just because of the gut-churning descriptions of autopsies — I am a big fan of C.S.I., after all. No, it was Scarpetta herself: she seemed increasingly humourless, increasingly reactionary living in her gated Virginia community, increasingly isolated and paranoid. This was all awhile ago and mostly forgotten as I picked up the newest paperback at the supermarket. Reading the first chapter it all came flooding back: the rarified Scarpetta literally sick because she has two glasses of wine from (shudder) a carton; Scarpetta the object of veneration from an equally driven, equally humourless young woman at a seminar she is giving (sidebar: you know all those unintentionally hilarious books/tv shows/movies that scream "Homoeroticism!" in neon letters three feet high that everyone but the oblivious heroes can see half a mile off? Well the Scarpetta novels are the only place I have ever seen this dynamic transposed, otherwise unaltered, onto female characters. Something on another planet than sisterhood. Something Kirk, Spock and Bones would recognize. Something closeted and Republican. But I digress.)
Blow Fly is not well written, and it is too full of convoluted loops begun in previous novels to be of much interest to new readers. But what is really irritating me is the way in which Scarpetta seems more than ever to be, in a blatant, where-the-hell-is-the-editor sort of way, an avatar for Cornwall herself. It is not just that the descriptions of the petite, mature, blond, blue-eyed Scarpetta could refer equally well to Cornwall's author photo (see above), though that cannot fail to impress when reading the description, early in the novel, of Jay, the serial killer de jour, looking down on his next victim, tied up and naked: .
Her wide, panicked eyes shine in the dark. In daylight, they are blue, a deep, beautiful blue. She painfully screws them shut as Jay caresses her with the beam of the flashlight, starting with her mature, pretty face, all the way down to her red painted toenails. She is blonde, probably in her early- to mid-forties, but looks younger than that, petite but curvaceous.
This woman has been chosen because she reminds Jay of Scarpetta, whom he hates. Scarpetta, the avatar of Cornwall. This is disconcerting. Almost as disconcerting is the way that Cornwall practically forces the reader/viewer to scrutinize her own appearance in the first place. One senses that the reader could very easily share in the disdain with which characters outside the inner circle are described, that diminishing circle of the select, battling back to back as the hordes of serial killers, corrupt politicians, soul-crushing bureaucrats, and people who drink wine from boxes close in.
This is not the story of a professional woman battling for respect in a "man's world"; it is a skewed, solipsistic vision of personal aggrievement.
So will I finish it? Of course I will. And then I will feel the same queasy aftertaste that I now remember from all the others. So who's caught in some weird, unhealthy feedback loop now? Huh?
Though it does strike me, sixty pages in, that Scarpetta has not been much in evidence. Perhaps Cornwall is tired of her too.
And all grousing aside: it's either Cornwall or that growing pile of marking.
Scribbled at October 10, 2004 11:14 PM AST | Permanent link to this post | More? books/readingTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://webteam.unb.ca/mt/asdf23wer234msadf.cgi/1000
I think many such serials become formulatic; there really is no expectation of a surprise. Have you ever tried Minette Waters?
Scribbled by Rachel Ann at October 11, 2004 10:48 AM | PermalinkI think many such serials become formulatic; there really is no expectation of a surprise. Have you ever tried Minette Waters?
Scribbled by Rachel Ann at October 11, 2004 10:48 AM | PermalinkYou know, I haven't read my way through all the Kay Scarpetta novels - I think I came in part way through - but you absolutely nail what I haven't liked about her! Thanks - great post.
Scribbled by New Kid on the Hallway at October 11, 2004 11:03 AM | PermalinkRachel Ann, it's not formulae I object to; I read some formula fiction quite happily (I'm a real Ian Rankin fan, for example, despite my crankiness about his last novel). But I think you're right in that something that might only niggle in one novel, could grow to be really irritating across a series.
Scribbled by mjones at October 11, 2004 11:21 AM | PermalinkI've stopped reading Cornwall, for reasons you've nicely laid out here, and in the end, because Scarpetti is just too full of herself. It's more than the boxed wine. The last one I read--can't recall the title--was particularly annoying in this sense ("I'm a super-coroner! I have good taste!"). For an interesting female lead, try T. Jefferson Parker's Red Light and Black Water.
Scribbled by cindy at October 11, 2004 12:46 PM | PermalinkAw, the memories. I was once a huge Cornwell fan but you've nailed the reason I stopped reading her: the pleasant diversion of the once truly novel characters of Dr. Kay and her brave disturbed niece, and the faithful sidekick detective buddy just started tasting like yesterday's canned soup, and it was all too easy to envision it spilled down the shirt of Marino the Slob while wading through the latest brave but pathologically disturbed escapade of Lucy! ha!
In fairness though, it seems I recall Cornwell trying to deviate from her formula at one point -- maybe it wasn't too successful. Which is too bad.
Scribbled by michelle palmer at October 12, 2004 4:18 PM | PermalinkI used to be an avid Cornwell fan, always anticipating the next release. Unfortunately, since Black Notice, I think, my interest has waned and I couldn't even finish Blow fly. I do remember making many notes about my disappointment and if I could just remember where...
It's kinda why I stopped watching L & O: SVU. But worse. There, the crimes got too disturbing. Cornwell's own avatar is too disturbing. And it bothers me that this seems to have happened since the married lover became toast.
I vote for Minette Walters any day, though.
I really agree! Unfortunately, I bought her latest novel at a convenience story cause I wanted to something to that evening to put me to sleep - and in my rush I forgot how much I disliked her more recent novels and how vowed never to buy another. Started out liking them, but found them increasingly absurd and uninteresting. Felt so disgusted over this last one, I mused about writing the author to vent my spleen. But, forgot, one can blog and - surprisingly - find like-minded souls. Could this novel have ever been published if it wasn't for the franchise that ensures a new one is an instant "success" due to prior bestseller listing?
Scribbled by Mary Helen at October 14, 2004 12:46 AM | PermalinkI felt manipulated when Patricia Cornwall brings back a character that was supposed to have been horidly murdered 3 books before, only to tell us that he was in the witness protection program all this time and that everyone except the main character was in on the deception.
Scribbled by charles bernstein at January 10, 2005 9:36 PM | PermalinkI felt manipulated when Patricia Cornwall brings back a character that was supposed to have been horidly murdered 3 books before, only to tell us that he was in the witness protection program all this time and that everyone except the main character was in on the deception.
Scribbled by charles bernstein at January 10, 2005 9:36 PM | Permalink